Page Banner

Full Text: Anthropos, 69.1974

Social Structure in the Southeastern Hindu-Kush: 
Some Implications for Pashai Ethno-History* 
R. Lincoln Reiser 
The Hindu-Kush and Karakoram mountain regions of Central Asia are 
among the most interesting but little known ethnographic areas of the world. 
Al °st of our information concerning these regions comes from British explorers 
an T amateur ethnographers who travelled through many of the high mountain 
galleys during the middle and late 19th century (Biddulph 1880, Robertson 
8%). More recently, European ethnologists and linguists - especially sc o ars 
fr °m Scandinavia, Austria, and Germany have organized expeditions with the 
Purpose of gathering data relevant to proto-Indo-Aryan language and cu tmre. 
has not been until very recently that a few anthropologists and linguists 
w ho Se interest is focussed on the analysis of ongoing social, cultural and hn- 
§uist ic systems have conducted research in this region. Although the European 
philologists are mainly interested in ancient folk-customs and belie s or cu 
tur *l reconstructions, the data gathered by social anthropologists also have 
lrri Phcations for the history of the area. The purpose of this paper is to reassess 
delusions concerning the ethno-history of the Pashai speaking peoples - one 
the ethnic groups located in the Hindu-Kush region. 
, The Pashai speaking peoples are Muslims of the Sunni branch who m- 
a hit a series of side valleys in the Kapisa, Laghman, Nangrahar, an unara 
|p°vinces of Afghanistan. Although no accurate census figures are aval a e 
^ time, most scholars estimate that about 100,000 people speak Pashai 
vMumlum 1959; 5). In general, subsistence is based on mixed herding an agn- 
cult ure. Herding has mainly a transhumant pattern. In the ™ ter the § oats ’ 
a ^tle, and sheep are stalled in permanent villages and taken to t e ig moun 
% A 
Anth r Ul ear ^ er version of this paper was presented in a symposium entitled "The 
at th e °:P 0lc, Sy of Central and Inner Asia: Current Status, Some Problems and Prospects” 
City j t annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association in New York 
WlS ^ thank Richard Strand, the discussant of my paper, and Fredrik 
’ c °rnmentator for the symposium, for useful comments and criticisms.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.