Contested Places 39 Anthropos 92.1997 this century, has some 19th century graves which provide evidence of more continuous habitation of the place during the last century. In Ete, a place some three kilometres upstream from Epupa, there are numerous old graves. Today there are no per manent settlements in Ete and all recent inhabitants who only go there seasonally to use the pasture, or to harvest the palm trees or to garden on the banks of the Kunene would probably be buried somewhere else. As settlement patterns change, so do the location of graveyards and the stones they leave provide evidence of the longevity of Himba habitation in Kaokoland. Although there are no outspoken animosities between the Himba and members of other ethnic groups, their graveyards are kept separate. Him ba only find it acceptable if Himba and Herero graves are put together in one graveyard. How ever in Opuwo and Okangwati the leading He rero families have their own separate graveyards. Tjimba, Hakaona, Zemba, Ngambwe, Thwa, and Koroka graveyards are kept separate from Himba graves and usually kept separate from each other as well. In particular, under no circumstances are the graves of the despised Thwa allowed to be sited near Himba graves. This parallels a marriage ta boo inhibiting intermarriage between these groups. Contact with the peripatetic Thwa (Bollig 1987; Estermann 1969) is thought of as polluting. Graves in Oronditi provide evidence of the separation of graves along ethnic lines. Oronditi, a place right beside the Kunene river, has been a place of Himba settlement for many years but has additionally been used as a crossing point and a trading post since the 1940s. In that function the place attracted many people of diverse ethnic origins. Today we find scattered on both sides of the river Himba, Tjimba, Nkumbi, Ngambwe, Thwa, and Koroka graves. This pattern of scattered graveyards of diverse ethnic backgrounds is repeated in several places along the river. It pays testimony to the fact that the lush riparian vegetation has attracted people of diverse origins, offering the poor and stockless some hope of survival. In general graves along the Kunene seem to be more scattered than grave sites in the interior. Whilst in the hinterland graveyards are clearly connected to one settlement, graveyards along the river, always situated on the alluvial banks of the Kunene, sometimes lack a clear affiliation to one settlement. Sometimes one graveyard is used by several settlements (e.g., Otjombapa) or one set tlement uses several grave sites (e.g., Oronditi). A glance at the water availability may explain these different patterns. Water resources inland (water storing sandy deposits in a river, natural wells, or boreholes) frequently have a limited potential and the next water point is often some distance away. The abundant waters of the Kunene river allow habitation of the entire riparian system all year round. 3.2 Status and Gender and the Construction of Graves Graveyards which have been used for a longer period of time show a confusing concentration of Fig. 2: “Modern” graves (Photo M. Bollig)